拍婚紗照怎麼選拍攝機構呢，你get it?

拍婚紗照是生活中最重要的事情。在拍婚紗照之前，你必須知道一些事情。現在，讓我們來分析一下如何拍攝我們最美好的時光和婚禮照片的正確姿勢。

如何選擇合適的圖片代理?大型婚紗組織，小型婚紗工作室與個人獨立攝影老師大對比。

想找家庭攝影師?專業的家庭攝影師能準確捕捉低你和家人最溫馨的一面。

大型婚紗攝影公司，可能是因為它更便宜。為什麼便宜?首先，與小型工作室相比，大型婚紗是由流水線生產的。在大規模生產的情況下，每天拍攝的照片量非常大，而且生產線非常豐富。如果你想旅行，你必須去各個國家拍攝。婚紗照，如巴厘島，泰國，新加坡，日本，韓國等國家。跟一家大型婚禮攝影公司合作是完全正確的。因為這些大機構會有當地的隊伍駐紮在那裏，所以會比其他小型的婚紗照機構便宜。攝影師的房間和住宿費用不適合你，婚紗也可以直接在地面上選擇，而且婚紗風格可能會很豐富。缺點是批量生產，它可能不是那麼獨特，可以采取所有相同的，從整體到建模，將有一個驚人的相似之處。

小型婚紗組織，產量低，價格偏高，而且選擇拍攝的地方會少得多。你選擇的拍攝婚紗照的地點范圍在一家小型婚紗店的范圍之內。婚禮樣式比較少，但如果它符合你的口味並滿足你對婚紗的幻想，那麼你就選擇一件小婚紗，因為他們的工作室不會和大婚紗一樣。

個人獨立攝影師

其中許多類別來自工作室工作室。所以有很大的差距。一個好的獨立攝影師可以成為一個小團隊與助手，以幫助照明和化妝。缺點是你必須為整個團隊付費，而服裝可能是由你自己准備的，或者是他們提供的唯一一兩件婚紗。但是，一個獨立攝影師在三個比較中最大的優勢是你的照片質量，你不必擔心它。因為這些獨立的個人攝影師也可能是曾經幫助明星或名人拍攝婚禮照片的攝影師。

我希望這對新娘們拍婚紗照有幫助。

婚宴場地佈置不能光依靠佈景，還需要完美的計畫制定以及風格的選擇，如果你對於婚宴風格不是特別了解，完全可以去婚享會尋找專業的婚慶設計公司，享受更為專業的諮詢服務。

拍這樣的婚紗照是獨一無二的

別忘了這些海邊婚禮的照片

新人是否了解婚紗的細節

選擇婚禮攝影公司讓你感到自在的小竅門

你能看到婚紗照的質量嗎

Posted by: You are the wind that I can't touch at 07:41 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 7 kb.

Interesting photos clearly show the best and worst place of work models for workers

Lego's lovely open up office structure presents spaces for focus and inspiration. Intended by Rosan Bosch & Run Rjord, photographer Anders Sune Berg.

Lego's workplace in Denmark is intended to let its staff members imagine and play like kids again, while still working like adults.

The center of the room has space for informal meetings -- including a slide from the second floor, if you don't feel like taking the stairs. The sides of the room have more private space where designers can concentrate on their work. The work tables have built-in bonsai gardens, and there are plenty of podiums and towers where designers can display and share their work with each other. Even the wallpaper is decorated with giant blades of grass, to put workforce into the mindset of their Legos.

This attractive workplace was clearly built with the needs of its employees in mind. Lego is not the only one. Here are refuge areas in Google's offices in Zurich, where people have privacy to think and be creative LI Shuping.

Fun refuge spaces at Google Zurich. Evolution Design, pictures by peter Wurmli.

But few business workers are so lucky. Many workers spend their days in mazes of cubicles or open-office plans that produce surprisingly more distractions than performance. On the average weekday, many Americans spend 8.7 hours at work or doing work-related activities -- about an hour more than they spend sleeping. This means that, given an average life expectancy of 78.6 years, a worker could easily spend more than a decade at their desk.

place of work designers have been trying to adapt offices for decades to better suit the nature of work, as well as meet company demands for cost-cutting and integrating new technology. Over the 20th century, the most popular office environment design has evolved from rows of offices with doors, to an open up plan made to facilitate collaboration, to the cubicle, back to an open office environment plan, and now to more mixed-used spaces.

The way that workplace design has evolved says a lot about the way we think about company organization and work in general. In the first half of the 20th century, many white-collar workplaces in the United States were still organized into rows of corridor offices. But by the 1950s, offices had begun to shift to the kind of layout you might see in "Mad Men”: a ring of offices around the corner of the room, surrounding a secretarial pool or accountants in the middle. In this design, only a company’s higher-ups had privacy: The lower-downs lived out their working lives in plain view.

Then in 1958, two German brothers developed the open business office layout that many workplaces embrace today. They did away with personal offices, changed the straight rows of desks into free-flowing groupings that were based on one’s department, and added in break areas and plants to visually break up the space. They called their design Bürolandschaft, or office landscape. The design was thought to facilitate collaboration, and, as The post’s Jena McGregor writes, it appealed to managers then and today because of its flexibility and cost-savings.

It was a little more than a decade later that walls went up once again, as the first cubicle was introduced.

The cubicle today is a symbol of workplace drudgery and tedium. ("We don’t have a lot of time on Earth. We weren’t meant to spend it this way,” the main character in "Office Space” says of his cubicle.) But like the shopping mall, the cubicle actually had surprisingly idealistic origins.

[9 things you didn't know about the business office cubicle]

Initially, the cubicle was seen as liberating, providing autonomy to workers who had grown weary of the "Big Brother is Watching You” experience of the open business office. The inventor of the cubicle, Robert propst, criticized the open place of work of the 1960s as a wasteland that "saps vitality, blocks talent, frustrates accomplishment.” The cubicle was intended to once again provide privacy and personal space, while also allowing for relatively easy communication.

For new corporations with a flatter structure, the cubicle also became a symbol of egalitarianism. Intel CEO Andy Grove famously sat in a cubicle. Executives including Meg Whitman of eBay, Michelle peluso of Travelocity, Tony Hsieh of Zappos and Joe Mansueto of Morningstar copied that practice.

Eventually, however, America fell out of love with the cubicle, and the laminate walls started to come down. Since the 1990s, many offices have shifted back toward the open up formats of yore, which are supposed to stimulate employee teamwork and collaboration.

Webber offers with slim top panel and easy set-up for a more comfortable and private workspace. The iCAB partition comes in different colour and size. Shop for the best one for your office now.

Employer Following

Office Makeover

different beta edition

Background from

Business office

Posted by: You are the wind that I can't touch at 07:15 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 815 words, total size 6 kb.